{"id":588,"date":"2025-05-05T14:48:00","date_gmt":"2025-05-05T12:48:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lars-hilse.de\/lhx18\/?p=588"},"modified":"2025-05-04T20:26:57","modified_gmt":"2025-05-04T18:26:57","slug":"feelings-matter-even-when-countries-are-involved-ei-trust-and-why-robots-might-help-or-screw-things-up","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lars-hilse.de\/lhx18\/2025\/05\/feelings-matter-even-when-countries-are-involved-ei-trust-and-why-robots-might-help-or-screw-things-up\/","title":{"rendered":"Feelings Matter (Even When Countries Are Involved): EI, Trust, and Why Robots Might Help (or Screw Things Up)"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div>\n

Alright, let’s talk about “emotional intelligence” or EI. Sounds kinda fluffy, doesn’t it? Especially when you stick it next to “international relations.” But here’s the deal: it makes a scary amount of sense \u2013 that EI is pretty damn crucial for building trust between nations. You know, trust? That thing that stops countries from constantly being at each other’s throats?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Basically, EI is about understanding your own emotions and figuring out what other people are feeling, then managing all that emotional baggage effectively. Think communication, collaboration \u2013 all that stuff needed when countries try to negotiate treaties or not start wars. Resources like Simply Psychology1<\/strong>and various articles on emotional confidence2<\/a> define it pretty clearly. Trust is the bedrock. Without it, diplomacy is just… posturing. And leaders with high EI? They\u2019re supposedly better at creating that trust-filled environment3<\/a>. Seems obvious, but you\u2019d be surprised how often it gets ignored.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

So, What Does EI <\/strong>Actually<\/em><\/strong> Do for Trust?<\/strong><\/h1>\n\n\n\n

Digging deeper, building trust isn’t just about being nice. It takes emotional awareness \u2013 knowing your own triggers \u2013 empathy, and decent people skills. Leaders high in EI get how their feelings impact others15<\/a>. This self-awareness lets them react better to how their team (or, you know, the opposing negotiating team) feels, making people feel safer and more willing to talk openly2<\/a>. Open communication, who knew?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Empathy: The Not-So-Secret Weapon?<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Empathy gets a big shout-out. It\u2019s apparently a “paramount leadership skill” for building trust1. Makes sense, I guess. If you can genuinely try to see where the other side is coming from, understand their needs and fears, you’re more likely to build rapport5<\/a>. LinkedIn articles<\/strong> on the topic4<\/a> and research suggest empathetic leaders are just seen as more trustworthy and effective15<\/a>. It helps cut through stereotypes and maybe even avoid massive foreign policy screw-ups, as Matt Waldman from the Center for Empathy (ceia)<\/strong>5<\/strong><\/a> points out, referencing mistakes in Afghanistan and Iraq rooted in misjudgements. Empathy isn’t sympathy or approval, he argues, it’s a rational tool for understanding adversaries5<\/a>. It played roles in South Africa overcoming apartheid and the Colombia peace process5<\/a>. Yet, it’s often sidelined in foreign policy5<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Why Should Bureaucrats Care About Trust? (Spoiler: It Affects Performance)<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Okay, so trust feels good, but does it do<\/em> anything? Apparently, yes. Sources like the Harvard Business Review<\/strong>4<\/strong><\/a> (or maybe another piece on trust elements3<\/a>), insists trust actually boosts performance. Teams that trust their leaders are more willing to deal with change, take risks, and innovate3<\/a>4<\/a>. Makes sense \u2013 you\u2019re not constantly looking over your shoulder. No trust? Expect disengagement, people quitting, and generally shitty results3<\/a>6<\/a>, possibly like How emotionally intelligent leaders build a culture of trust<\/strong>6<\/a> suggests.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Okay, Fine. How Do We <\/strong>Get<\/em><\/strong> More Trust Using EI?<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Some strategies, sounding suspiciously like self-help advice, may work. Focus on self-awareness and empathy. Things like asking for feedback (gulp), mindfulness (sure, okay), or even keeping a journal can help you regulate your own emotional crap12<\/a>. And shocker: encouraging open communication where people feel safe sharing their thoughts \u2013 even the critical ones \u2013 strengthens trust3<\/a>4<\/a>. Who’d have thought?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Let’s Get Real: EI in the Diplomatic Trenches<\/strong><\/h1>\n\n\n\n

Enough theory. Does this stuff actually work in the messy world of diplomacy? Some examples and insights:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Can You Test for Diplomatic Feels? (Situational Tests)<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Apparently, you can try. Tools like the STEM and STEU tests, developed back in 2008 by MacCann and Roberts, according to The Measurement of Emotional Intelligence: A Critical Review…<\/strong>7<\/strong><\/a>. These tests try to measure how well diplomats manage and understand emotions in specific situations. STEM looks at regulation, STEU at understanding7<\/a>. The fact that these tests exist and are used suggests people do<\/em> think EI matters in practice7<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Don’t Be a Jerk Abroad (Cultural Sensitivity)<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

This seems obvious, but apparently needs stating. Being culturally sensitive is part of EI. The example of a diplomat in Japan respecting local customs, like the business card ritual8<\/a>, as cited in Helpful Professor’s<\/strong> list of diplomatic skills. Doing this shows emotional awareness, builds goodwill, and makes negotiations smoother8<\/a>. As another LinkedIn piece by Arya Singh Rathore<\/strong>6<\/strong><\/a> puts it, reading between the lines in indirect cultures (like Japan or China) versus being direct in others (like the US or Germany) is key6<\/a>. It’s about adapting.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Keeping Cool When Shit Hits the Fan (Crisis Management)<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Diplomacy isn’t all tea and treaties. Crises happen. And guess what? EI is vital then too. A diplomat managing an emergency, like sudden political chaos in another country, needs to handle their own emotions and read the room9<\/a> – another skill highlighted by Helpful Professor<\/strong>9<\/strong><\/a>. Keeping calm, managing tensions, and maintaining trust when everything’s going sideways? That\u2019s EI in action9<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Playing the Long Game (Longitudinal Impact)<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

This isn’t about quick wins. EI helps build diplomatic relationships that actually last<\/em>. Using empathy, negotiation skills, and good crisis management over time builds resilient alliances8<\/a>10<\/a>. The example given is the ongoing (and let’s face it, often frustrating) peace talks between North and South Korea \u2013 attempts, however flawed, to use EI to manage tensions and maybe, just maybe, build some trust8<\/a>10<\/a>, as possibly discussed in Communicating with Diplomacy and Tact<\/strong>10<\/strong><\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Enter the Robots: Can AI Help Humans Feel (or Fake It Better)?<\/strong><\/h1>\n\n\n\n

Now things get weird… how Artificial Intelligence might crash the EI party in international relations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

AI Trying to Understand Feelings (AI’s Contribution)<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

AI is getting scary good at processing information, including human emotions. Natural Language Processing (NLP) and affective computing letting AI analyze emotions in real-time from text, voice, even facial expressions12<\/a>13<\/a>, potentially drawing on insights from places like the Frontiers journal article on AI in mental health<\/strong>12<\/strong><\/a> or Simply Psychology’s examples<\/strong>13<\/strong><\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Emotional AI: Is That Even a Thing?<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Yep, “Emotional AI” is apparently emerging. The goal is AI that can perceive<\/em> and react<\/em> to human emotions by analyzing facial expressions, voice tone, even heart rate12<\/a>. Imagine AI adapting its responses to seem empathetic12<\/a>. Kinda creepy, kinda useful? It could potentially help people manage their own emotions12<\/a>. Some research, like that mentioned by ESCP<\/strong>2<\/strong><\/a>, highlights the challenge here: true EQ involves deep empathy and social nuance that algorithms struggle with2<\/a>. Human emotions are messy, contradictory, and culturally loaded \u2013 hard to code2<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

How Might AI Boost Our EI? (Applications)<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n